Government posture
The official evidence supports governance guidance and draft-law consultation, but not a final enacted Thai AI law in the sources captured here.
Thailand’s retrieved official materials show a layered governance posture: ETDA’s AI Governance Center, a 2019 AI ethics guideline, a 2023 executive AI governance guideline, a 2022–2027 national AI strategy page, and a 2025 consultation on draft AI-law principles.
The official evidence supports governance guidance and draft-law consultation, but not a final enacted Thai AI law in the sources captured here.
Thailand’s strongest direct official evidence is governance frameworks, readiness and risk assessment toolkits, and ethics principles. This should not be mistaken for a fully operational national AI assurance centre unless directly sourced.
The expanded ASEAN generative-AI guide cites ThaiLLM as a use case, but that citation is illustrative and is not modeled as a national governance instrument by itself.
ETDA’s AIGC structure includes international advisory and networking functions, and Thailand’s national AI page references cooperation with foreign researchers and experts.
สำนักงานพัฒนาธุรกรรมทางอิเล็กทรอนิกส์
Thai digital-governance agency represented here through official AI governance guidance, AI Governance Center activity, ethics principles, and draft AI-law consultation sources. The imported rows do not treat the draft-law consultation as enacted law.
ศูนย์ธรรมาภิบาลปัญญาประดิษฐ์
ETDA-hosted AI governance center framed as a cross-network cooperation platform for governance framework development, consultation, knowledge exchange, and networking.
Official national AI strategy and action-plan programme page for Thailand, including readiness work on ethics, law and regulation and a strategy line for AI sandboxes.